But new ebook readers do not have as long battery lives as the old (less bright) ebook readers. Yes, the oasis has worse, probably battery life (it has more leds also) though how fast it drains (past the first indexing and updating of OS) depends above all on how bright you have the screen on. I am not the person you asked about the oasis being preferrable to the paperwhite. I think if one never used a e-ink ebook reader of an ergonomic size, then they got no idea that it is different, both eye and hand/wrist comfort.Īlso dedicated ebook readers, being so slow at everything else, can be much more focusing than reading on a phone or tablet. >I guess many are still using their phones when reading. Eink ebook readers (not the kindle fire, no) also are so bad and slow at everything but reading they are fantastically focusing and limiting dispersion. In my country kobo plus is much better and half the price of kindle unlimited for example).īut whichever you pick do your eyes a favor and get an eink model. Also check how expensive books are for each ecosystem, what programs there are in your country (library lending compatible to which models. I think search text is much better in amazon system, as is page numbering, but everything else about organizing documents and open formats and all is much better with kobo. Its battery life is not that bad either, not when compared to comparable kobo models with buttons.īut there is an important difference in ecosystems. I love the buttons, it allows you to swap right or left handle with no issue, not move fingers to swap pages and the balance, the back ridge of the kindle oasis is just fantastic. Saw this on my feed, and for me the best, most ergonomic for my hands ebook reader is the kindle oasis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |